Open the app

English grammar

Is/are + participle (the state) vs was/were + participle (the action)

Tell an action (were closed) from the state it leaves behind (are closed).

From the scene It's already closed

In short

Is / are + participle describes a state now. Was / were + participle describes the action, often with by or when.

Your turn

Which one goes with action: was/were + participle (+ by, what happened)?

Options: the door is sealed off · they were closed last night by the developer · the flats are closed

Show answer

action: was/were + participle (+ by, what happened) → they were closed last night by the developer

How it works

Is/are + participle describes the state you find something in right now: the flats are closed, the door is sealed off.

Good to know

Was/were + participle describes the action itself, often with by to say who did it, and it answers 'when': they were closed last night by the developer, when was it signed?

Good to know

Stressing was can mean the state is now over: it WAS sealed (not any more).

state: is/are + participle (how it is now) the flats are closed

action: was/were + participle (+ by, what happened) they were closed last night by the developer

Nuria

They were closed last night by the developer. Without telling anyone.

Fueron cerrados anoche por la promotora. Sin avisar a nadie.

Your turn

What fills the gap?

(blank). Without telling anyone.

Options: They were closed last night by the developer · The flats are closed · The door is sealed off

Show answer

Nuria

They were closed last night by the developer. Without telling anyone.

Fueron cerrados anoche por la promotora. Sin avisar a nadie.

state: a description right now the door is sealed off

Nuria

No. The door is sealed off, yellow tape and everything.

No. La puerta está precintada, con cinta amarilla y todo.

Your turn

What fills the gap?

No. (blank), yellow tape and everything.

Options: The door is sealed off · The flats are closed · They were closed last night by the developer

Show answer

Nuria

No. The door is sealed off, yellow tape and everything.

No. La puerta está precintada, con cinta amarilla y todo.

action: asking when it happened when was it signed?

Tomás

Signed? And when was it signed?

¿Firmada? ¿Y cuándo fue firmada?

Your turn

What fills the gap?

Signed? And (blank)?

Options: they were closed last night by the developer · when was it signed · the flats are closed

Show answer

Tomás

Signed? And when was it signed?

¿Firmada? ¿Y cuándo fue firmada?

a state that's over now (stressed) it WAS sealed

Elena

It WAS sealed, Tomás. Was.

Estaba sellado, Tomás. Estaba.

Your turn

What fills the gap?

(blank), Tomás. Was.

Options: It WAS sealed · The flats are closed · They were closed last night by the developer

Show answer

Elena

It WAS sealed, Tomás. Was.

Estaba sellado, Tomás. Estaba.

Common mistake

Not were or have here. A state, right now.

Tomás, Don Ramón's cousin's flats are closed.

Tomás, los pisos del primo de Don Ramón están cerrados.

Practise it in the story

Meet this rule inside a short animated scene. Answer as it plays, then say the lines yourself.

Practise free in the app
See all forms
Is/are + participle (the state) vs was/were + participle (the action)
state: is/are + participle (how it is now)the flats are closed
action: was/were + participle (+ by, what happened)they were closed last night by the developer
state: a description right nowthe door is sealed off
action: asking when it happenedwhen was it signed?
a state that's over now (stressed)it WAS sealed
More lines from the story
  • NuriaTomás, Don Ramón's cousin's flats are closed.Tomás, los pisos del primo de Don Ramón están cerrados.
  • ElenaLegal, dear. The sale is already signed. I have it on good authority.Legal, hijo. La venta ya está firmada. Lo sé de buena fuente.

All English grammar guides · Learn English with stories